Primavara, fata mare, A sosit in sat la noi, |
Total 3 Comentarii | 1 |
  Adaugat de: oGeHVxZ0 |
09 August 2014 (16:43) |
GsqV46DSb3w | |
I had assumed a lot of the bigegr journals must be running al l photos of gels (or similar outputs) through automatic rout ines to check for discontinuities of contrast' etc basic ally any feature that would indicated cut n paste, or dicey non-linear contrast enhancement. Don't they all ask for th e original non photo shopped at all' TIFF images? It remi nds me a bit of student plagiarism, where we as a Faculty ha ve now (this last several years) taken to making students su bmit all written work electronically to a central server and running every single piece of it automatically through plag iarism-checking software.PS Nice re-touch job by your proge ny, BTW. And cheaper than botox, if you keep it in the famil y ! |
  Adaugat de: ku1XT1WmS1 |
09 August 2014 (23:00) |
FIL78iOPzV | |
That it's commonly done, I know! Is it etacihl? I don't kno w.It's a tough call, because an artist can claim that he/sh e hasn't updated his/her photo recently. The same way I don 't for my lab website. But even if done with clear intent, is it wrong? Does an artist owe anyone a recent depiction?Ph otoshopping, most would agree, is a different issue. But is adding clarity to the proof always so different from the lig hting and focus in the actual photo? Tough call. |
  Adaugat de: PPht5uJC4fyi |
05 Iunie 2016 (05:28) |
FD4aVTFmEX | |
November 1, 2012 at 11:18 amI have both a plastic digital scale and a glass one, and my weight varies by almost 3 pou nds. The plastic scale being the one to say I way more. I&1 ;#278m not sure which one to believe. Reply |
1 |